In this section we present our Five Golden Rules of best corporate governance practice - key concepts in embracing good corporate governance and best practices in business. Embracing these principles will mean the company’s culture and therefore public image will shine out as an example of an open, well and fairly run organisation.
The public image of a corporation will quite accurately reflect the culture of that body. It follows, then, that good corporate governance has to be in the bones and bloodstream of the organisation since this in turn will be reflected in the culture. To carry the analogy further, in the same way that healthy blood and bones are reflected in the naturally healthy look of a person, so an organisation whose internal functions are healthy will naturally look so from an external perspective.
Our Golden Rules of best corporate governance practice are like a health manual for your organisation and come with a practical diagnosis and treatment programme which we set out in our new Corporate Governance Course, a series of ebooks delivered over 6 days by email. The first ebook, an introduction to corporate governance and the ACG methodology, is available free of charge - simply subscribe to this site to receive your copy (see the form at the top right of the page).
When Bill Hewlett and I put together the initial plans for our business enterprise in 1937 ... (we decided) that we wanted to direct our efforts towards making important technical contributions to the advancement of science, industry and human welfare.
The above quotation expresses the early aspirations of two entrepreneurs when they started their business. The principles these two men espoused at the beginning became part of the ethos of the business they founded and persist to this day.
Similarly, Ernest Butten shortly after he founded the management consultancy Personnel Administration in 1943, issued a document which he called the P.A. Charter. The clear vision behind this document shines through, and was to drive the business forward through his sale of the business into trust for its staff and well through his retirement twenty five years later. "EB's" presence permeated the company and guided its behaviour for a generation.
This intention and ability to create a vision and turn it into a way of life for the company may be regarded as nothing unusual until one compares a supposed entrepreneur and builder of multinational corporations, Robert Maxwell, whose empire collapsed after he died, with another entrepreneur and business builder, Thomas J Watson, whose creation, International Business Machines, is still a global force to be reckoned with over eighty years after he founded it.
From the above examples, we can draw some conclusions and formulate a short set of rules regarding best corporate governance practice. All the “goodies”, to a great degree, abided by these rules. All the “baddies” to a large extent ignored them. The principles underlying these rules are:
Hence, with due respect to Milton Friedman who is quoted as believing that the social responsibility of business begins and ends with increasing profit, we contend that running the business successfully is not simply about market domination and shareholder value.
And best corporate governance practice is not simply about a battle between distant, disloyal institutional shareholders and greedy directors but about the ethos of the organisation and fulfilling its clearly agreed goals.
These goals may be set by the entrepreneur who starts the business, but they are accepted by all parties as being high-minded and in everyone’s interests. This is notwithstanding the fact that some parties have bigger stakes and some benefit more than others. And, of course, different parties want different things from the company. There has to be, therefore, a process of identifying the different needs and, as much as possible, harmonising them. This is the starting point for the smooth running of the business. Once dissonance in the common goal creeps in the danger of the standard of corporate governance deteriorating rises steadily.
Clearly external regulation can only play a limited part in ensuring that such a deep-seated and beneficial culture as that described above exists. Equally clearly, however, the task of ensuring this desirable state and adhering to best corporate governance practice belongs to the various stakeholders, who can and should, through their proper participation, bring this about.
As we have iterated, this section of the website lays out and explains our view of best corporate governance practice and the holistic approach by which we believe an organisation can ensure that a state of good corporate governance exists, or is brought into being if its existence is uncertain. It takes the view that there is an over-riding moral dimension to running a business and that the standard of governance will depend on the moral complexion of the operation. Hence the approach developed is based on the belief that:
the business morality or ethic must permeate the entire operation from top to bottom and embrace all stakeholders best corporate governance practice is an integral part of good management practice also permeating the entire operation, and not an esoteric specialism addressed by lawyers, auditors and sociologists
The principles of this approach are therefore framed in relation to the conventional way of looking at how a business should be properly run.
Our Five Golden Rules of best corporate governance practice are:
This approach recognises that the interests of different stakeholders carry different weight, but it does not, by any means, suggest that those with a major interest matter and the rest don’t. On the contrary, best corporate governance practice dictates that all stakeholders should be treated with equal concern and respect.
For obvious reasons, although the methodology we will propose involves taking major stakeholders into greater account when formulating strategy, it is designed to generate all round support because of the fact that every stakeholder, no matter how small, is given the opportunity to express a view, through the continuous monitoring of stakeholder perceptions. It is key to the approach that organisations truly respect the minority interests. Like the spirit of the US constitution, the approach can be said to embrace liberty, equality and community, but like the US economy, it aspires to produce the most powerful and effective result in the world.
The regulatory approach to the subject would regard governance as something on its own, to do with ensuring a balance between the various interested parties in a company’s affairs, or more particularly a way of making sure that the chairman or chief executive is under control, producing transparency in reporting or curbing over-generous remuneration packages. This indeed is what the Cadbury recommendations and the subsequent reports and code are all about. However, as we express in the rest of this website, we regard this as much too limited a view of governance, and hence of best corporate governance practice.
The essence of success in business is:
There are very many websites and publications advising on how to do this, and of course, this is what is described as good management.
Best corporate governance practice is about achieving the stakeholders’ goal, and delivering success in an ethical way. Hence it follows that it must entail a holistic application of good management.
To demonstrate the totality, and the need for a holistic approach, we present below an illustration showing the pressures on a large organisation.
Pressures on a Company
It is important that a wide perspective is taken when considering corporate governance because we cannot emphasise too strongly our belief that good management practices, as described in the rest of this section of the website, will deliver good corporate governance. Compliance with checklists of regulations and codes, in the setting of bad management or a lack of commitment to good management, will NOT deliver good corporate governance. The longer term consequences of this externally-applied regulatory approach will be a progressive introduction of more and more rules which are held in less and less regard, and which produce less and less effect.
The result benefits neither business nor its customers, and has only served to spawn a growing industry of specialist advisers in corporate governance and lobby groups. It has also failed to prevent more and bigger corporate failures. So while the most of the provisions of the various Codes of Conduct could certainly be considered best corporate governance practice - or at least good corporate governance, if they are imposed externally and not truly bought into by every part of the company and its stakeholders, and monitored effectively, there will always be those who try - and succeed - in hiding from or bending the rules.
As Professor Sir George Bain once said to us, the big advantage of the shareholder model over the stakeholder model in management terms is the simple goal it presents: maximise shareholder value. No such simple target attaches to the stakeholder approach, and yet without a clear goal, management faces an impossible task in trying to do its job properly - what exactly is its job?
In our experience of working with and observing management over the past thirty years in all kinds of situations, from the leaders of some of the largest companies in the world to the owner/managers of small entrepreneurial businesses, a general rule stands out. The governance, the goals and the strategy of a business must be compatible, and there must be congruence between the expectations of the various interested parties. Clearly, in defining best corporate governance practice, this means that:
Much of this website is therefore devoted to the process whereby a board, and the main stakeholders, can ensure that the company complies with the Five Golden Rules of best corporate governance practice.
Now read about the Golden Rules in detail:
Rule 1: The Importance of Business Ethics
Rule 2: Towards a Common Goal - Align Business Goals
Rule 3: The Importance of Strategic Management
Rule 4: Organisational Effectiveness for Good Corporate Governance
Rule 5: The Importance of Corporate Communication
Our corporate governance seminar series and small group workshops are a great way of learning our unique methodology and how to apply it to your own organisation. This methodology is also explained in our corporate governance course, a series of ebooks delivered direct to your inbox over 6 days.
We also have plans for an eLearning platform to deliver personalised corporate governance training to a wider audience at your convenience. If you would like to talk to us about implementing a corporate governance programme in your company please fill in the contact form.
Search this site: